PHYSICIAN-LED CONTRACT RESEARCH
If you're stuck on your research project, you're in the right place to move it forward.
Method before output
Most research support ends at the deliverable: a table, a plot, a draft, handed over without the thinking that produced it. That works until someone asks why you chose that comparator, or that model, or that cutoff. Then the deliverable is worth nothing and you are on your own. We work the other way round.
Choosing an outcome, a comparator or an eligible population is a medical judgement before it is a technical one. A statistician can run the wrong analysis flawlessly. A clinician can pick the right outcome and analyse it badly. We work at the point where those two failures meet.
You receive the documented R or Stata script alongside the results. Re-run it, extend it, hand it to a reviewer, or check it against your own understanding. A number you cannot trace is a number you cannot defend.
Limitations are stated plainly and proportionately, not buried in a closing paragraph. A study with honest limits survives peer review. A study with hidden ones gets found out, usually in public.
Read the method yourself
We are a new company. We are not new to the method. The evidence syntheses below were co-authored by our team and carry a DOI each. Read the search strategy. Read the risk-of-bias assessment. Read how the limitations are worded. That is the standard your project gets.
What we take on
Bring the whole study, or the one part that has stalled. Both are normal, and neither is treated as the lesser request.
Turn a scattered literature into one pooled answer you can defend line by line.
3 services
The working relationship
Work arrives in milestones, so you see the methodology before it is baked into six months of analysis.
Two ways to work with us
You do not have to hand over the whole project to get help with the part that is not moving.
Complete research workflow
One team carries the question through design, protocol, analysis, interpretation, writing and revision. Nothing is handed between vendors, so nothing is lost in the handover. Best when the study has not started, or has started badly.
A single research stage
A meta-analysis on data you have already extracted. A statistical analysis on a dataset you already hold. A protocol due next week. A reviewer comment you do not know how to answer.
Methods notes
Written for people running research, not for people buying services. Why a non-significant Cochran’s Q does not license a fixed-effect model. How immortal time bias gets built into a cohort definition without anyone noticing. No promotional mail, and one click to leave.
Reviewers, editors, journal priorities and whether your study contributes anything new are outside our control, and outside everyone else’s. Any service that guarantees acceptance is either misdescribing peer review or describing something you would not want your name attached to. What is inside our control is the method, the transparency of the analysis, the accuracy of the reporting, and conclusions that stop where the evidence stops. Tell us what you want to find out and where you have got to. We will tell you what we think is feasible, and we will tell you if the answer is nothing.